Aligning IS and Business Strategy

As will be a tradition this week, I present an introductory rant about the topic at hand, and since today is Tuesday it’s IT Strategy day it’s time to talk about strategy.Â

It’s a given that IT strategy ‘must align with business strategy’.  Yet it is quite difficult to get this right – not least because it is hard to align an IT strategy with a business strategy when there isn’t a business strategy.  There is another article on this site (‘Getting IT Right!‘) that talked about those things that need to be done to ‘Get IT Right!’.  There was a follow-up presentation to that, which I will post in due course, that used the COBIT framework to identify 20 core business goals, prioritise those goals, the best  accounting tools for business and then map those goals to fundamental IT activities – which of course should provide direction to IT strategy that is aligned with the business.

These business goals, as outlined by COBIT, are:

Financial Perspective
1. Expand market share
2. Increase revenue
3. Return on investment
4. Optimise asset utilisation
5. Manage business risks
Customer Perspective
6. Improve customer orientation and service
7. Offer competitive products and services
8. Service availability
9. Agility in responding to changing business requirements (time to market)
10. Cost optimisation of service delivery
Internal Perspective
11. Automate & integrate the enterprise value chain
12. Improve & maintain business process functionality
13. Lower process costs
14. Compliance with external laws/regulations
15. Transparency
16. Compliance with internal policies
17. Improve & maintain operational & staff productivity
Learning and Growth
18. Product/business innovation
19. Obtain reliable and useful information for strategic decision making
20. Acquire and maintain skilled and motivated personnel

COBIT is a very useful approach to use in IT consulting, and although it was originally developed as an IT Audit tool, it makes a lot of sense to adapt COBIT to a ‘doing’ framework as opposed to an ‘assurance’ framework.  BDO Kendalls uses COBIT as its framework in all consulting services to our SME clients, and it is a very valuable tool for that purpose.Â

Those in the know will recognise these business goals as driven by a balanced scorecard philosophy.  Using COBIT, it is possible to rank these goals, and then identify the IT activities and focus that align with the business goals.  I will be posting more around this approach in this area of strategy, but essentially if a business cannot identify its business strategy in a cohesive form – which, alas and alack, is often the realpolitik IS professionals must deal with – a process to rank these business goals can be very useful in identifying what IT activities are needed to align IT with the business.

Next week:  how to go about ranking the business goals.Â

Online fraud and banking risk

Today a news item that caught my eye was particularly relevant – we organised our finances online on Saturday and heartily congratulated ourselves for the extra time this will save us.

I can manage shareholdings, home mortgage, personal credit cards, bank accounts, and superannuation accounts online now.  This is to save us time since we can’t make it to branches during the 9-4 bank hours most banks and branches are open.

And of course the banks would appear to have been refusing to put in higher levels of security to get that last 10% or so of fraud that is occurring, and have been merely investigating and covering client’s losses when it occurs.  According to this news item, though,  you’ll find yourself having to cover your own losses when they occur if the banks and ASIC have their way.

NowI hope it is a ‘reasonable precautions’ approach – I can theoretically understand why the person who has the most control should be responsible for any losses arising from a weakness in that control, but if I have antivirus and spamguard-type solutions in place, and I still get caught, I could get taken for quite a bit even if I am careful.  And the level of sophistication of many home users (still) is such that they can’t possibly put in place antivirus, and make sure that it is working.  I have seen a number of antivirus solutions that are confusing to the novice user, where the system for updating and maintaining the software is just not clear.  And let’s be clear:  these are smart intelligent people – people who know how to do things that I don’t, such as paving, chocking a mitre joint, and welding – who just aren’t across the 101 things you need to have right.  Things such as firewalls (router or software-based?), antivirus (how do I keep it up to date?  Or even realising it needs to be kept up to date), spamguard (that email’s not from my bank?), Windows patches (you need to keep installing, every month, to keep it up to date?), spyware (I’ve got nothing to hide, have I?).
And unfortunately,  I think people do tend to overestimate their sophistication with computers – computers seem to fall in the same category as sex, driving, and being ‘a good judge of character’.  80% of people think they have above-average computer skills, which is patently not the case (I am reminded of my wife, with two degrees and an eminently sensible person, who struggled over the weeekend to copy files from one directory to another without losing track of what had been copied; she also once put a floppy disk in upside down and back to front in a computer of mine – very helpful for a floppy drive I don’t think).

So in sum – I’m agin it.

What is Open Source Software and When Can Business Use It?

I attach the presentation and workbook from today’s workshop in Melbourne. Apologies to any participants inconvenienced by not having the properly bound workbook – we had an email, internet, and “assumption that everything worked” problem.

What is Open Source Software and When Can Business Use it? (CPA Congress 2006):

If you attended today’s workshop, I would welcome any feedback you had to offer.

CPA Congress Presentation

I am now sitting in the Qantas lounge of Melbourne airport.  I just delivered (about an hour and a half ago) the workshop presentation on Open Source Software.  Overall I think it went fairly well, although the final measure is how the participants felt it went.  A pity about the smaller number.  I am also concerned that we identified far more issues and risks around open source software than perhaps we needed to, although it is clear that any organisation that is risk averse and considering the introduction of open source software, in a world where everything works and is stable, is going to have to be careful about moving their infrastructure from one software base to another. 

The main point of the presentation was to consider the issues and understand your business’ strategic direction with information systems if you decide to use open source.  I think open source presents unique, but not unsurmountable, issues for the business, and some real issues.  Our conclusions today lead one to think that perhaps though these opportunities are more back-office and commercially focussed, for most businesses, than in the front office – looking at today. 

Putting the hat on for five years from now?  Who knows, perhaps we won’t know or care where our software comes from – perhaps it will mostly be web-based (a la Google’s takeover of Writely) and the world will move away from Vista and its thick-client cohorts. 

Well, I’m about to board.  I wonder if any of the participants at today’s workshop will stop by to leave comments.  I will upload the presentation and workbook later tonight as a PDF (when I get home about 10.30pm <groan> – a bit late after a 5.30am start this morning).

Diamonds are forever

As a consultant, I am in many ways often a sort of ‘troubleshooter’. It is interesting – we often go into businesses that are having particular problems, and can sometimes almost sense the stage of the business in the growth cycle. An owner of a business can often be singularly frustrated and downtrodden by the grey nothingness and lack of effectiveness of the business, and thinking that the business is not going anywhere. However, it is usually the case that things are never as bleak, nor as rosy, as they at first appear.

I sometimes liken a business to that most adolescent of youthful enterprises, the rock band. The life of the band and the life of the business eerily parallel each other. For instance, let me consider a little-known rock band who we will call The Beatles, since that is their name.

Like most rock bands, The Beatles started in 1962 when John and Paul were sitting in a Liverpudlian garage (my rock history is a little rusty but they may have met at reform school) dreaming about creating their own rock band. The dream that many thousands since have aimed for, and the dream that many a guitar sold at a music shop was destined to founder upon. For most of us, this rock-star dream never ventures past the striden fondling of a guitar string, but for The Beatles… they made it past the dreaming stage. They showed initiative and actually formed the band!

Having initiated the band, The Beatles started to practice a bit, heard some crazy sounds coming out from a continent far away, and had a little bit of success playing the odd Liverpudlian wedding or German beer-hall. Many bands fail at this juncture – at least one of the band members (usually the tall gangly one) gets a girlfriend and everything falls apart in a mixture of acrimony and accusations of a lack of commitment amongst band members.

The Beatles survived this stage to really attack the world. They attacked every pub they could find, managed to get paid occasionally (sometimes in beer, but beer is a form of currency I’m sure), and generally were successful. Then, right when they were about to break loose onto the world in a really mature fashion, they lost the drummer. For some bands, this is a devastating blow. For others it’s a good thing – the drummer is sometimes derided as the person who hangs around with musicians. But – it can be a crisis point. Again, the Beatles managed to survive and really mature as a band. Their records at the time were fresh and enthusiastic, energetic, and a whole new sound. They had – or so they thought – mastered the genre. But there was a new crisis facing these rock stars.

The Beatles needed to keep rejuvenating and overhauling their sound so that they stayed relevant to their fan base. They overhauled their approach to music, experimented, and occasionally allowed George Harrison to select their wardrobes and – gasp – write his own songs rather than the tried and true combination of Lennon-McCartney. They moved to the next level of musicdom, an overhauled sound that was truly awe-inspiring and lived on as a legend. They were flexible and did some amazing things just to keep the band together. Those first heady days of true success were overcome, the excitement was kept through overhauling their sound, and they generally kept the ship on track. The release of the White Album is vindication of that period.

The Beatles started to broaden their interests. They networked with other musicians, they even made their own record company – Apple. This collaborative power boosted and kept the Beatles together for some time even when internal band relationships – as they always do – started to collapse.

By 1970, though, the crises had started to really build. Many blamed Yoko Ono and atrocious art. Others blamed substance abuse. In the end though, the band members diversified their interests, and the band no longer seemed as important as once it did. The band had grown, survived many crises, and finally broke up amidst acrimony and accusations of bad facial hair. The rock star dream had lived and died the path that many rock stars have taken, and many adolescent rock-star wanna-be’s have tried. At each stage The Beatles met a crisis whilst they were growing, and ended up meeting the music challenges that were presented. Statistically, many rock bands have been faced with exactly the same challenges, but most quickly collapse against those same challenges.

Now – you may be asking how all this is analogous to business. Well, most business owners are the rock stars. They create the business, take the risks, and want to achieve the tangible outcomes that rock stars get (and only rarely receive – inane reality TV shows like Big Brother aside). The challenges that the businesses face are quite relevant to businesses – although an exact parallel to Yoko Ono is hard to identify it is difficult to imagine any business relationship surviving well if the new girlfriend wanted to repaint thereception in hot pink and strew her naked photographs around the workshop.

The growing business – and if your business is not growing, it is shrinking – needs to meet the challenges of growth – at BDO Kendalls this is referred to as the DIAMOND model (Dream, Initiate, Mature, Overhaul, Network, and Diversify). The corporate strategy determines your market position, and having selected that you can build your channels to market thrugh the marketing plan, build people capability through a human resources plan, and build systems through an information systems plan.
The fast growing business needs to stay focussed on its goals through these plans, and any strategic approach that uses a measurable and defined approach is good advice for the business. The one I favour is the Verne Harnish ‘Mastering the Rockefeller Habits’ approach, which builds a long-term strategy but identifies 90-day ‘rocks’ that must be delivered quarterly. This approach advocates a 15-minute ‘huddle’ every day, a weekly team meeting, a monthly meeting that focusses on strategy, and a quarterly meeting to set the new rocks for the next 90 days. It sounds like a lot of meetings, but it does work and it truly helps for communicating strategic intent.

Finally, it’s time to consider what this all means. Although the parallels are not exact, business is like that high-school rock band. The challenges of growth are similar, and instead of focussing on the unique nature of the business it is useful to consider how businesses are very similar to each other. Once that is recognised, the strains, stresses and challenges of growth can be more easily diagnosed, planned for, and resolved. The challenge for the business owner is often to know how businesses work, and to apply these lessons in practice.

The business owner is the one person in the band who can really set the scene, experiment with the band’s sound, and deliver their own new crazy sound in business. They innovate and set the tone for the business’ approach to solving problems. The business owner is the one who must rise to the challenge of the business, and this is not resolved by hard work alone. The business owner needs to assemble his own excellent team (sometimes, you will need to get a new drummer, but the band needs to go on). By working on the business, developing the strategy and building the business’ capability, the business owner can becomea true business Rock Star.


This blog post is broadly a representation of a ‘prepared speech’ Micheal provided to Rostrum Club 17 on 19th July 2006 on the subject ‘Troubleshooters’.