Well, about 18 months ago I bought a new Macbook Pro. I had sworn that Mr Gates’ hegemony had to deliver on Windows 7, and, although it was OK, it was not quite to the standard I wanted. So I thought that, as I am currently doing my phd full time, it would be a good idea to try out this Mac thing full time. On account of how my need for my computers to play well with others on a corporate network is less.
And, speaking as a Windows user of long standing, generally it’s been a Good Thing. Sure, the Macbook was expensive compared to the Windows equivalents, but then the software is generally cheaper and OSX just feels more bulletproof. Of course, software development is a bit harder to get into (but then AppleScript is very good), but at least when Office 2011 came out they brought back VBA for Mac Office. Thank goodness!
And there are two items of software on the Mac that I have coveted and used a lot since converting to the Mac side. Devonthink Pro is one that I have just not managed to find an equivalent for – which should be the subject of a future post – and Scrivener is the other. In fact, I made a video on YouTube and a post here on my blog, and since it’s consistently my most popular blog post and video by a mile, there’s a lot of love for it.
So, I have adopted Scrivener for writing. And it’s a great all-round writing package. The structure, the mechanism behind it, and the ability to compile to many formats (including ebook) and slice-and-dice your writing is wonderful. I of course also have Office 2011 for ‘other writing’ and for final formatting.
The default for most phd candidates is of course Word, and on the Mac that’s periodically been a beast competent at short writing but not so good at long writing. However, I have recently been using it to write a large report for a client (55 pages, 20,000 words) and in the space of 24 hours it lost me 6 hours’ (yes, even with auto recovery files being saved every 10 minutes). I would be editing and moving text around in Microsoft Word and then I’d get the spinning wheel of death (see – I have turned into a Mac user). Word would just end up not responding. And when you’re consulting for a client that is paying hourly, losing that many hours is not much fun for your hip pocket. Nothing like the market’s invisible hand to make you think about your software choice.
Turns out there is a bug with the ‘Smart Cut-and-Paste’ function – go to /Word /Preferences /Editing Options and turn off Smart Cut-and-Paste and that problem with Word in Office 2011 crashing should go away. After I found that tip I proceed to write for a week without a single crash. I had been blaming it for EndNote incompatibility but this document wasn’t using that and I’d disabled that functionality.
So. Word on the Mac can be made to work. Although you can still lose work, and it is dependent upon you regularly saving your document if you want to avoid wholesale problems (and saving is slow on Word).
And so to Scrivener. I love Scrivener. Mostly. The structured approach is good and the ability to move your text around is fantastic.
However – there are several issues for academic writing. Graphics were a problem for a while but I worked out you need to draw your diagram in another package (e.g. Powerpoint), save to PNG, import the image, and then scale the image to consistently be the width of the page (411 pixels, incidentally).
Firstly – and insurmountably – you do have to play with the world of others if you are a co-author with people. If you are the primary author, then you can compile, send it to your co-authors, and have them mark it up with changes for you replicate in your document. But it’s a bear if your supervisor says, ‘Just give me the electronic copy and I’ll finish the report for you’. Particularly since styles and text tags (such as the <$n:table:demographics> table you have on page 6) don’t translate to tags in Word – when they are expecting these things.
Secondly – and I suspect uniquely to academic writing – Scrivener’s tables, well, there’s no better phrase to describe it: Scrivener’s tables suck. Mostly because if it’s anything other than a straight vanilla table with no merged cells and so on, aligning tables is pedantic. And I know that that’s because it’s really OSX’s tables. And I know that Microsoft Word’s tables are proprietary and thus evil. But, the tables just cannot be made to work. I had gotten to the stage where I would do the tables up specifically in Word, and then import the RTF document (putting all the tables in their own sub-directory, with the same name as the $n:table reference in Scrivener) into Scrivener. And that sort of worked when it was compiled out. But sort of not.
Thirdly, a lot of academic papers come with arbitrary word limits and requiring submission in Word. I have just had a paper accepted at AMCIS that was ’5000 words including tables and references’. Great – so I have to compile with EndNote every time I want to know how many words this thing is (noting, I suppose, this is really a function of EndNote’s sulkiness and thus you have to do this with Word too). But you end up compiling from Scrivener to RTF, formatting EndNote tokens, saving to DocX and then reviewing the final output and changing a word on page 4 – and now you have two copies of your paper. Sigh. So you track change that paper, and then re-input your changes back to Scrivener later… which is every bit as painful as it sounds. And if you then edit the paper in Scrivener, you’ll have to re-do all that formatting again.
Finally – it is in the nature of the academic to procrastinate. If a paper is due at 5pm, then at 4:55pm you will be madly checking the format. One of the great things Scrivener does is separate the writing from the formatting. But the formatting is integral – presentation is communication. Formatting the paper can take Quite a While. And as Styles in Scrivener don’t work as they do in Word, a decision to make your section headings 18 points instead of 16 points can really wreck your day. This is a problem when you are up against a tight deadline.
So… I am conflicted with Scrivener. I think that for writing the Great Australian Novel it is the perfect tool. And being able to compile different versions of the same document is excellent as well. However, there are a few issues that I am trying to get my head around to make it work for academic writing. I just may have to accept that I do not have the time to do that and thus may need to ‘stick with Word’ for my PhD. As a bit of a ‘new tool’ buff, and being able to see the advantages of Scrivener, that hurts, but more procrastination just isn’t an option when you are past the journey to knowledge and wanting to graduate.
[Footnote: Since writing this post, I have gone back to using Scrivener as Word crashes far too often on the Mac. Word is fine for two page letters on the Mac but that's as far as I'd trust it. I have written an automatic style formatter in Word (very rough, very basic, and very ugly) that converts fonts of a certain size to a Heading 1, 2, 3 and 4 style in Word - see this post here: Scrivener to Word Visual Basic Fromatter].